Journal article
Convergence liberalism and the problem of disagreement concerning public justification
- Abstract:
-
The ‘convergence conception’ of political liberalism has become increasingly popular in recent years. Steven Wall has shown that convergence liberals face a serious dilemma in responding to disagreement about whether laws are publicly justified. What I call the ‘conjunctive approach’ to such disagreement threatens anarchism, while the ‘non-conjunctive’ approach appears to render convergence liberalism internally inconsistent. This paper defends the non-conjunctive approach, which holds that t...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 351.3KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/00455091.2016.1270701
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy Journal website
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 541-564
- Publication date:
- 2017-01-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-12-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1911-0820
- ISSN:
-
0045-5091
- Source identifiers:
-
664546
Item Description
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:664546
- UUID:
-
uuid:590966cb-e240-4e56-9b75-daafcbb7e40c
- Local pid:
- pubs:664546
- Deposit date:
- 2016-12-08
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Taylor and Francis at: 10.1080/00455091.2016.1270701
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record