- Abstract:
-
The ‘convergence conception’ of political liberalism has become increasingly popular in recent years. Steven Wall has shown that convergence liberals face a serious dilemma in responding to disagreement about whether laws are publicly justified. What I call the ‘conjunctive approach’ to such disagreement threatens anarchism, while the ‘non-conjunctive’ approach appears to render convergence liberalism internally inconsistent. This paper defends the non-conjunctive approach, which holds that t...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted manuscript
- Files:
-
-
(pdf, 351.3KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/00455091.2016.1270701
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy Journal website
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 541-564
- Publication date:
- 2017-01-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-12-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1911-0820
- ISSN:
-
0045-5091
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:664546
- URN:
-
uri:590966cb-e240-4e56-9b75-daafcbb7e40c
- UUID:
-
uuid:590966cb-e240-4e56-9b75-daafcbb7e40c
- Local pid:
- pubs:664546
- Copyright holder:
- © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Taylor and Francis at: 10.1080/00455091.2016.1270701
Journal article
Convergence liberalism and the problem of disagreement concerning public justification
Actions
Access Document
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record