Journal article icon

Journal article

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter duration (3-month vs. 28-day) prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions: systematic review and economic modelling

Abstract:

Background

To reduce expenditure on, and wastage of, drugs, some commissioners have encouraged general practitioners to issue shorter prescriptions, typically 28 days in length; however, the evidence base for this recommendation is uncertain.

Objective

To evaluate the evidence of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shorter versus longer prescriptions for people with stable chronic conditions treated in primary care.

Design/data sources

... Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3310/hta21780

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
Population Health
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Grant:
Health Technology Assessment programme


Publisher:
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
Journal:
Health Technology Assessment More from this journal
Volume:
21
Issue:
78
Publication date:
2017-12-21
Acceptance date:
2017-01-09
DOI:
EISSN:
2046-4924
ISSN:
1366-5278
Pmid:
29268843


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:813155
UUID:
uuid:58356d06-a69c-4502-ba3e-c17fcfa57c8b
Local pid:
pubs:813155
Source identifiers:
813155
Deposit date:
2018-01-08

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP