- Abstract:
-
The Necker cube and the productive class of related stimuli involving multiple depth interpretations driven by corner-like line junctions are often taken to be ambiguous. This idea is normally taken to be as little in need of defense as the claim that the Necker cube gives rise to multiple distinct percepts. In the philosophy of language, it is taken to be a substantive question whether a stimulus that affords multiple interpretations is a case of ambiguity. If we take into account what have ...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted manuscript
- Publisher:
- Springer Verlag (Germany) Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Synthese Journal website
- Volume:
- 193
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 1409-1432
- Publication date:
- 2014-07-19
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-0964
- ISSN:
-
0039-7857
- URN:
-
uuid:53e9f152-be35-43c6-b3fb-93eb0dc3618a
- Source identifiers:
-
478990
- Local pid:
- pubs:478990
- Copyright holder:
- Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
- Copyright date:
- 2014
- Notes:
-
This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is
available online from Springer at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0518-y
Journal article
Can visual cognitive neuroscience learn anything from the philosophy of language? Ambiguity and the topology of neural network models of multistable perception
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record