Journal article icon

Journal article

Cell assisted lipotransfer in breast augmentation and reconstruction: A systematic review of safety, efficacy, use of patient reported outcomes and study quality

Abstract:

Background

Cell-assisted lipotransfer serves as a novel technique for both breast reconstruction and breast augmentation. This systematic review assesses the efficacy; safety of cell assisted lipotransfer as well use of patient-reported outcomes in these studies. We also carry out an objective assessment of study quality focusing on recruitment, follow-up and provide an up-to-date clinical trial landscaping analysis.

Methods

Key electronic databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines and pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers examined the retrieved publications and performed data extraction.

Results

3980 publications were identified. Following screening, 11 studies were included for full review, representing a total of 336 patients with a follow-up time ranging from six to 42 months. A degree of variation was noted in graft retention and reported satisfaction levels, although there were only three comparative studies with conflicting results. Complications occurred at a rate of 37%. Additionally, there was a paucity of objective outcomes assessments (e.g. 3D assessment modalities or validated patient reported outcome measures) in the selected studies.

Conclusions

Cell-assisted lipotransfer is a surgical technique that is currently employed sparingly within the plastic & reconstructive surgery community. Presently, further technical and outcome standardization is required, in addition to rigorous randomized controlled trials and supporting long-term follow-up data to better determine procedural safety and efficacy. Routine use of more objective outcome measures, particularly 3D assessments and validated patient reported outcome measures, will also help facilitate wider clinical adoption and establish procedural utility.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.jpra.2016.08.004

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author



Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
JPRAS Open More from this journal
Volume:
10
Pages:
5-20
Publication date:
2016-08-01
Acceptance date:
2016-08-16
DOI:


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:640101
UUID:
uuid:51875965-541e-41b5-95c9-afdc704b1154
Local pid:
pubs:640101
Source identifiers:
640101
Deposit date:
2016-08-21

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP