Journal article
Data-driven methods distort optimal cutoffs and accuracy estimates of depression screening tools: a simulation study using individual participant data
- Abstract:
-
Objective
To evaluate, across multiple sample sizes, the degree that data-driven methods result in (1) optimal cutoffs different from population optimal cutoff and (2) bias in accuracy estimates.
Study design and setting A total of 1,000 samples of sample size 100, 200, 500 and 1,000 each were randomly drawn to simulate studies of different sample sizes from a database (n = 13,255) synthesized to assess Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening accuracy. Optimal cutoffs were selected by maximizing Youden's J (sensitivity+specificity–1). Optimal cutoffs and accuracy estimates in simulated samples were compared to population values.
Results Optimal cutoffs in simulated samples ranged from ≥ 5 to ≥ 17 for n = 100, ≥ 6 to ≥ 16 for n = 200, ≥ 6 to ≥ 14 for n = 500, and ≥ 8 to ≥ 13 for n = 1,000. Percentage of simulated samples identifying the population optimal cutoff (≥ 11) was 30% for n = 100, 35% for n = 200, 53% for n = 500, and 71% for n = 1,000. Mean overestimation of sensitivity and underestimation of specificity were 6.5 percentage point (pp) and -1.3 pp for n = 100, 4.2 pp and -1.1 pp for n = 200, 1.8 pp and -1.0 pp for n = 500, and 1.4 pp and -1.0 pp for n = 1,000.
Conclusions Small accuracy studies may identify inaccurate optimal cutoff and overstate accuracy estimates with data-driven methods.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 712.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.031
Authors
Contributors
+ Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) EPDS Group
- Role:
- Contributor
+ Stein, A
- Division:
- MSD
- Department:
- Psychiatry
- Role:
- Contributor
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 137
- Pages:
- 137-147
- Publication date:
- 2021-04-07
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-03-29
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1878-5921
- ISSN:
-
0895-4356
- Pmid:
-
33838273
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1178023
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1178023
- Deposit date:
-
2021-06-28
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.031
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record