Journal article icon

Journal article

Response to my commentators

Abstract:

This is my response to the critical commentaries by Hasker, McNaughton and Schellenberg on my tetralogy on Christian doctrine. I dispute the moral principles invoked by McNaughton and Schellenberg in criticism of my theodicy and theory of atonement. I claim, contrary to Hasker, that I have taken proper account of the ‘existential dimension' of Christianity. I agree that whether it is rational to pursue the Christian way depends not only on how probable it is ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Accepted Manuscript

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/s0034412502006108

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
College Only
Department:
Oriel College
Oxford college:
Oriel College
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
Journal:
Religious Studies Journal website
Volume:
38
Issue:
03
Pages:
301-315
Publication date:
2002-09-17
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-901X
ISSN:
0034-4125
Pubs id:
pubs:701301
URN:
uri:44ea0b86-2f8d-40e2-bad6-04d6f24d18a5
UUID:
uuid:44ea0b86-2f8d-40e2-bad6-04d6f24d18a5
Local pid:
pubs:701301
Language:
English
Keywords:

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP