In his paper 'Wang's Paradox', Michael Dummett provides an argument for why strict finitism in mathematics is internally inconsistent and therefore an untenable position. Dummett's argument proceeds by making two claims: (1) Strict finitism is committed to the claim that there are sets of natural numbers which are closed under the successor operation but nonetheless have an upper bound; (2) Such a commitment is inconsistent, even by finitistic standards. In this paper I claim that Dummett's a...Expand abstract
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright date:
Strict finitism refuted?
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record