Journal article
Shared decision making: a need for honesty?
- Abstract:
-
In this analysis we challenge the conceptual honesty of ‘shared decision-making’, arguing that whilst it is held up as an ideal decision-making standard, it is used too often to describe (and justify) decision-making practices that are not shared at all. This is problematic because if the legitimacy of a decision relies on it being ‘shared’, but it is not in fact shared, the decision loses legitimacy, or is falsely legitimised by the appearance of being shared. We argue that the realities of...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
Actions
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners Publisher's website
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice Journal website
- Volume:
- 68
- Issue:
- 671
- Pages:
- 292-293
- Publication date:
- 2018-05-31
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-05-31
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Pmid:
-
29853595
- Source identifiers:
-
857617
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:857617
- UUID:
-
uuid:4217af7a-1427-48f1-863e-5a1899aa7494
- Local pid:
- pubs:857617
- Deposit date:
- 2018-06-25
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- British Journal of General Practice
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © British Journal of General Practice 2018
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record