Journal article icon

Journal article

Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study

Abstract:

Background Contemporary general practice includes many kinds of remote encounter. The rise in telephone, video and online modalities for triage and clinical care requires clinicians and support staff to be trained, both individually and as teams, but evidence-based competencies have not previously been produced for general practice.

Aim To identify training needs, core competencies, and learning methods for staff providing remote encounters.

Design and setting Mixed-methods study in UK general practice.

Method Data were collated from longitudinal ethnographic case studies of 12 general practices; a multi-stakeholder workshop; interviews with policymakers, training providers, and trainees; published research; and grey literature (such as training materials and surveys). Data were coded thematically and analysed using theories of individual and team learning.

Results Learning to provide remote services occurred in the context of high workload, understaffing, and complex workflows. Low confidence and perceived unmet training needs were common. Training priorities for novice clinicians included basic technological skills, triage, ethics (for privacy and consent), and communication and clinical skills. Established clinicians’ training priorities include advanced communication skills (for example, maintaining rapport and attentiveness), working within the limits of technologies, making complex judgements, coordinating multi-professional care in a distributed environment, and training others. Much existing training is didactic and technology focused. While basic knowledge was often gained using such methods, the ability and confidence to make complex judgements were usually acquired through experience, informal discussions, and on-the-job methods such as shadowing. Whole-team training was valued but rarely available. A draft set of competencies is offered based on the findings.

Conclusion The knowledge needed to deliver high-quality remote encounters to diverse patient groups is complex, collective, and organisationally embedded. The vital role of non-didactic training, for example, joint clinical sessions, case-based discussions, and in-person, whole-team, on-the-job training, needs to be recognised.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2023.0251

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2369-8088
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8954-7584
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0502-9844
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0006-8356-2907


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Grant:
NIHR302740


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
74
Issue:
738
Pages:
e17-e26
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2023-12-28
Acceptance date:
2023-08-30
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643
Pmid:
38154935


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1573645
Local pid:
pubs:1573645
Deposit date:
2024-04-19

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP