Journal article
Using the contribution matrix to evaluate complex study limitations in a network meta-analysis: a case study of bipolar maintenance pharmacotherapy review
- Abstract:
-
Limitations in the primary studies constitute one important factor to be considered in the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence. However, in the network meta-analysis (NMA), such evaluation poses a special challenge because each network estimate receives different amounts of contributions from various studies via direct as well as indirect routes and because some biases have directions whose repercussion in the network...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- BioMed Central Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BMC Research Notes Journal website
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 218
- Publication date:
- 2016-04-14
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-03-31
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1756-0500
- Source identifiers:
-
616869
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:616869
- UUID:
-
uuid:3eb16fa0-6651-4848-bc4e-550d7466bef6
- Local pid:
- pubs:616869
- Deposit date:
- 2016-04-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Toshi Furukawa et al
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record