Journal article icon

Journal article

Results of a national asthma campaign survey of primary care in Scotland.

Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To identify within primary care in Scotland how far procedures for asthma review and patient education match guideline recommendations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Telephone survey of a one in four stratified random sample of all 1058 general practices in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Practice nurses, general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of practices matching guideline recommendations for asthma review, targeting of care, use of structured asthma records, provision of management plans, education, and regular audit. RESULTS: Of 276 general practices contacted 91% (251) completed the questionnaire; 93% (228) ran an asthma review service; 74% (166) employed a specially trained asthma nurse; 39% (106) had a policy for providing action plans; 63% (155) had carried out an asthma audit in the previous 3 years; 76% (218) used a structured tool in consultations, 46% with use of computer technology, 34% used only a manual stamp. Sixty-six per cent (173) had searched for patients overusing beta2 agonists; 32% (79) had searched for patients on medication treatment step 3 and above. Single- or two-partner practices were less likely to follow guideline recommendations but neither rurality nor deprivation was related to guideline compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of Scottish general practices have trained asthma nurses and offer patients asthma review, but only a minority have proactive care procedures for targeting patients or a policy for providing patients with action plans. Practice systems are underused for identifying 'at-risk' patients. There is a need for proactive procedures and provision of self-management materials to patients. Access to trained asthma nurses needs to be improved.
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1093/intqhc/mzi036

Authors



Journal:
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua More from this journal
Volume:
17
Issue:
3
Pages:
209-215
Publication date:
2005-06-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1464-3677
ISSN:
1353-4505


Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP