Journal article
A comparison of statistical approaches for analysing missing longitudinal patient reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials
- Abstract:
- Missing data are a potential source of bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but are generally unavoidable in clinical research, particularly in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). For longitudinally collected outcomes, often only a small subset of participants will have complete data for all relevant time points. Approaches to handling missing longitudinal data include maximum likelihood (ML), multiple imputation (MI) and inverse probability weighting (IPW).
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- BioMed Central Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Trials Journal website
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- S1
- Pages:
- 200:P325
- Publication date:
- 2017-05-08
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-01-01
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1745-6215
- Source identifiers:
-
734967
Item Description
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:734967
- UUID:
-
uuid:3e843943-baca-4140-95c5-a917fd00f9ba
- Local pid:
- pubs:734967
- Deposit date:
- 2017-11-03
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Rombach et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record