- Abstract:
-
A popular explanation for the small number of women at the top level of intellectually demanding activities from chess to science appeals to biological differences in the intellectual abilities of men and women. An alternative explanation is that the extreme values in a large sample are likely to be greater than those in a small one. Although the performance of the 100 best German male chess players is better than that of the 100 best German women, we show that 96 per cent of the observed dif...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1576
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Department:
- Medical Sciences Division - Experimental Psychology
- Institution:
- University of Manchester
- Department:
- Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Department:
- Medical Sciences Division - Experimental Psychology
- Institution:
- Brunel University
- Department:
- Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging
- Publisher:
- Royal Society Publishing Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B
- Volume:
- 276
- Issue:
- 1659
- Pages:
- 1161-1165
- Publication date:
- 2009-03-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1471-2954
- URN:
-
uuid:3dd2aef5-0b9e-4ab9-a3c6-6106a24bfae3
- Local pid:
- ora:3792
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- Copyright holder:
- Royal Society
- Copyright date:
- 2009
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page. Citation: Bilalić, M. et al. (2009). 'Why are (the best) women so good at chess? Participation rates and gender differences in intellectual domains', Proc. R. Soc. B 276(1659), 1161-1165. [Available at http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/].
Journal article
Why are (the best) women so good at chess? Participation rates and gender differences in intellectual domains
Actions
Access Document
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Contributors
+ Merim Bilalić
+ Kieran Smallbone
+ Peter McLeod
+ Fernand Gobet
Funding
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record