Thesis icon

Thesis

Measuring social impact – the conceptual and empirical advancement of an emergent concept

Abstract:

This thesis develops a theoretical foundation for measuring social impact. It focuses on 'social purpose organisations', for example non-profit organisations. Its original contribution lies in the conceptual proposition of measuring social impact through assessing how an organisation enhances social productivity by creating capitals, for instance social, cultural or political capital. It proposes measuring capitals as an alternative to currently prevalent metrics surrounding: (1) costs and benefits; (2) life-satisfaction; (3) capabilities.

The research tests the 'capital based approach' in three empirical cases located in Germany. The studies consider multiple capitals, but focus on the main one for each intervention: (1) social capital in community oriented housing for elderly people; (2) cultural capital in a school-based intervention on pro-sociality; (3) political capital related to an online platform for citizens and politicians. The conceptual proposition combined with this 'multi-site multi capitals' setup generates knowledge on social impact in four different ways.

First, by tapping into established capitals measures across the social sciences the research mitigates the measurement problem—the challenge of translating social impact into measurable components. Second, by using capitals as a set of interconnected measures, which are furthermore at close proximity to organisational activities, it helps address the attribution problem—the difficulty of establishing causal links between an intervention and its effects. Third, by turning to capitals it highlights intermediate outcomes and processes in the creation of social impact and thereby deals with the aggregation problem—a loss of information when focussing only on final social outcomes. Fourth, by seizing on the position of capitals which are located in between individuals and the community, it responds to the foundation problem—the potential discrepancy between group level welfare and individual utilities or capacities.

The research tackles the most pressing challenges in social impact measurement and thus significantly advances its theory and practice.

Actions


Access Document


Files:

Authors


More by this author
Division:
SSD
Role:
Author

Contributors

Role:
Supervisor
Role:
Supervisor
Role:
Examiner
Role:
Examiner


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford


Keywords:
UUID:
uuid:3d0746c2-e27b-49c0-87f1-66ee44f0f74f
Deposit date:
2018-03-28

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP