Journal article icon

Journal article

Précis of The Boundary Stones of Thought

Abstract:

If pressed, I could sum up The Boundary Stones of Thought in six words: classical logic good; classical semantics bad. However, somewhat less telegraphically…


The book aims to advance rational debate between adherents of rival logics of conjunction, disjunction, and negation. For the most part, the rivalry I focus on is classicists versus intuitionists (although classicists clash with quantum logicians in §6.6). Debates over basic logical laws tend to fall prey to a vitiating ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Accepted Manuscript

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/s11098-018-1112-9

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Humanities Division
Department:
Philosophy
Oxford college:
All Souls College
Publisher:
Springer Verlag Publisher's website
Journal:
Philosophical Studies Journal website
Volume:
175
Issue:
8
Pages:
2063–2066
Publication date:
2018-08-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1573-0883
ISSN:
0031-8116
Pubs id:
pubs:854132
URN:
uri:3b2bd2a3-9c2a-428a-8758-f2652483276f
UUID:
uuid:3b2bd2a3-9c2a-428a-8758-f2652483276f
Local pid:
pubs:854132

Terms of use


Metrics



If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP