Journal article
Précis of The Boundary Stones of Thought
- Abstract:
-
If pressed, I could sum up The Boundary Stones of Thought in six words: classical logic good; classical semantics bad. However, somewhat less telegraphically…
The book aims to advance rational debate between adherents of rival logics of conjunction, disjunction, and negation. For the most part, the rivalry I focus on is classicists versus intuitionists (although classicists clash with quantum logicians in §6.6). Debates over basic logical laws tend to fall prey to a vitiating ...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted Manuscript
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(pdf, 182.5KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s11098-018-1112-9
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Springer Verlag Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Philosophical Studies Journal website
- Volume:
- 175
- Issue:
- 8
- Pages:
- 2063–2066
- Publication date:
- 2018-08-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-0883
- ISSN:
-
0031-8116
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:854132
- URN:
-
uri:3b2bd2a3-9c2a-428a-8758-f2652483276f
- UUID:
-
uuid:3b2bd2a3-9c2a-428a-8758-f2652483276f
- Local pid:
- pubs:854132
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Springer Nature
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Springer Nature at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1112-9
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record