Journal article
Nuisance and privacy
- Abstract:
- Discusses Fearn v Tate Gallery Board of Trustees (CA) on whether interference with privacy was an actionable private nuisance, in the context of the overlooking of luxury flats from an art gallery's viewing platform. Details practical factors supporting the ruling, including the difficulty of distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable overlooking, the grounds for dismissing ECHR art.8 claims, and the alternative remedies.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Sweet and Maxwell Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Law Quarterly Review Journal website
- Volume:
- 137
- Issue:
- Jan
- Pages:
- 1-6
- Publication date:
- 2021-01-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-08-20
- ISSN:
-
0023-933X
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1225820
- Local pid:
- pubs:1225820
- Deposit date:
- 2022-03-15
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Thomson Reuters
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2022 Thomson Reuters.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The definitive published version is available online on Westlaw UK.
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record