This article argues against the case for regarding bodies and parts of bodies to be property. It claims that doing so assumes an individualistic conception of the body. It fails to acknowledge that our bodies are made up of non-human material; are unbounded; constantly changing and deeply interconnected with other bodies. It also argues that holding that our bodies are property does not recognise the fact that we have different attitudes towards different parts of our removed bodies and the ...Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright date:
Interconnected, inhabited and insecure: why bodies should not be property.
Views and Downloads
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record