Journal article
Narrow-band imaging for detection of neoplasia at colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND & AIMS:Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality assurance measure for colonoscopy. Some studies suggest that narrow band imaging (NBI) may be more effective at detection of adenomas than white-light endoscopy (WLE) when bowel preparation is optimal. We conducted a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of NBI to WLE in detection of adenomas. METHODS:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases, through April 2017, for randomized controlled trials that assessed detection of colon polyps by high-definition WLE vs NBI and from which data on individual patients was available. The primary outcome measure was ADR adjusted for bowel preparation quality. Multilevel regression models were used with patients nested within trials, and trial included as a random effect. RESULTS:We collected data from 11 trials, comprising 4491 patients and 6636 polyps detected. Adenomas were detected in 952/2251 (42.3%) participants examined by WLE vs 1011/2239 (45.2%) participants examined by NBI (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] for detection of adenoma by WLE vs NBI, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P=.04). NBI outperformed WLE only when bowel preparation was best: adequate preparation OR, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.92-1.24; P=.38) vs best preparation OR, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P=.02). Second-generation bright NBI had a better ADR than WLE (second-generation NBI OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P=.02), whereas first-generation NBI did not. NBI detected more non-adenomatous polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P=.008) and flat polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS:In a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials, we found NBI to have a higher ADR than WLE, and that this effect is greater when bowel preparation is optimal.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, 331.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.014
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Gastroenterology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 157
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 462-471
- Publication date:
- 2019-04-15
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-04-12
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1528-0012
- ISSN:
-
0016-5085
- Pmid:
-
30998991
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:994623
- UUID:
-
uuid:264feb5a-1ce6-413d-bfae-831dd9dc4d4c
- Local pid:
-
pubs:994623
- Source identifiers:
-
994623
- Deposit date:
-
2019-04-26
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- AGA Institute
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 by the AGA Institute.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.014
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record