Journal article icon

Journal article

On Hatzimoysis on sentimental value

Abstract:
Despite its apparent ubiquity, philosophers have not talked much about sentimental value. One exception is Anthony Hatzimoysis (The Philosophical Quarterly 53: 373-379, 2003). Those who wish to take sentimental value seriously are likely to make use of Christine Korsgaard's ideas on two distinctions in value. In this paper I show that Hatzimoysis has misrendered Korsgaard's idea before showing how Hatzimoysis' treatment of it is mistaken.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1007/s11406-008-9142-8

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Reading
Department:
Department of Philosophy
Publisher:
Springer Publisher's website
Journal:
Philosophia Journal website
Volume:
37
Issue:
1
Pages:
149-152
Publication date:
2009
DOI:
EISSN:
1574-9274
ISSN:
0048-3893
URN:
uuid:264ae8aa-ea3e-4d4c-bab8-4d795677c268
Local pid:
ora:4811
Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:

Terms of use


Metrics



If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP