Journal article
In defense of the argument for emotional assent
- Abstract:
-
This paper defends the argument that the irrationality of recalcitrant emotions can only be explained by understanding emotions as yielding a distinctly nonjudgmental assent. The four premises of the argument are identified, and the three controversial premises are defended against recent rejoinders. Particular attention is given to defending the argument from theorists who advocate that (nonassentist) perceptualist models either adequately explain the irrationality of recalcitrant emotions o...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- University of Illinois Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- American Philosophical Quarterly Journal website
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 51-62
- Publication date:
- 2018-01-01
- EISSN:
-
2152-1123
- ISSN:
-
0003-0481
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
935705
- Local pid:
- pubs:935705
- Deposit date:
- 2020-06-12
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Rights statement:
- © 2018 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from University of Illinois Press at https://www.jstor.org/stable/45128598
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record