Journal article
PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews.
- Abstract:
-
Introduction
For any health intervention, accurate knowledge of both benefits and harms is needed. Systematic reviews often compound poor reporting of harms in primary studies by failing to report harms or doing so inadequately. While the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses) helps systematic review authors ensure complete and transparent reporting, it is focused mainly on efficacy. Thus, a PRISMA harms checklist has been developed to...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Funding
Alberta Innovates, Health Solutions
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BMJ (Clinical research ed.) Journal website
- Volume:
- 352
- Pages:
- i157
- Publication date:
- 2016-02-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2015-12-11
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1756-1833
- ISSN:
-
0959-8138
- Source identifiers:
-
601672
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:601672
- UUID:
-
uuid:22ec9240-7d2d-4cc0-a942-a46941ba28be
- Local pid:
- pubs:601672
- Deposit date:
- 2016-03-14
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016. All research papers in The BMJ are published with open access. The BMJ's default licence for open access publication of research is the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial licence (CC BY-NC 4.0).
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record