Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is less than optimal. Recent methodologic analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which boast the elimination of systematic error as their primary hallmark. Systematic error in RCTs reflects poor science, and poor science threatens proper ethical standards. A grou...Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright date:
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record