Does randomized evidence support sertraline as first-line antidepressant for adults with acute major depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cipriani, A; Furukawa, TA; Geddes, JR; Malvini, L; Signoretti, A; McGuire, H; Churchill, R; Nakagawa, A; Barbui, C

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary evidence suggested that sertraline might be slightly superior to other antidepressant medications in terms of efficacy. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare sertraline with any other antidepressant in the acute phase treatment of major depression at 8 weeks. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE; EMBASE; the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register; and the Cochrane Central Register of Control...

Expand abstract

Publication status:

Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Geddes, J. R., Malvini, L., Signoretti, A., McGuire, H., Churchill, R., Nakagawa, A., & Barbui, C. (2008). Does randomized evidence support sertraline as first-line antidepressant for adults with acute major depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(11), 1732–1742.

MLA Style

Cipriani, A., et al. “Does Randomized Evidence Support Sertraline as First-Line Antidepressant for Adults with Acute Major Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 11, 2008, pp. 1732–42.

Chicago Style

Cipriani, A, TA Furukawa, JR Geddes, L Malvini, A Signoretti, H McGuire, R Churchill, A Nakagawa, and C Barbui. 2008. “Does Randomized Evidence Support Sertraline as First-Line Antidepressant for Adults with Acute Major Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 69 (11): 1732–42.
Tweet
Print