- Abstract:
-
Context
The aim of this study was to ask whether there are shared ideas about what good health care looks like that apply across different populations and conditions. Do priorities among “seldom heard” groups differ from mainstream views and, if so, how might we understand these differences?
Design
Focus groups were recruited with the help of our study patient representatives. Participants discussed and prioritized a set of eight “core components” of good care. We...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Publisher's version
- Publisher:
- Wiley Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Health Expectations Journal website
- Publication date:
- 2017-02-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-11-15
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1369-7625
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:675962
- URN:
-
uri:1d9d8a4d-1d6a-408a-8b4e-74a93542c354
- UUID:
-
uuid:1d9d8a4d-1d6a-408a-8b4e-74a93542c354
- Local pid:
- pubs:675962
- Copyright holder:
- Ryan et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © 2017 The Authors. Health Expectations Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal article
Do we all agree what “good health care” looks like? Views from those who are “seldom heard” in health research, policy and service improvement
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record