- Abstract:
-
Rapid advances in genome editing, including CRISPR-Cas9 endonucleases, and their potential application in medicine and enhancement have been hotly debated by scientists and ethicists. Although a veto on germ line gene editing has been proposed1, the use of gene editing on human cells in the clinical context remains controversial, particularly for interventions aimed at enhancement2. In a report on human genome editing the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) note that “important questions ra...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted manuscript
- Publisher:
- Nature Publishing Group Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Nature Biotechnology Journal website
- Volume:
- 35
- Pages:
- 1021–1023
- Publication date:
- 2017-11-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-09-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1546-1696
- ISSN:
-
1087-0156
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:738331
- URN:
-
uri:1173d669-823d-48d8-9e88-6b2802c72642
- UUID:
-
uuid:1173d669-823d-48d8-9e88-6b2802c72642
- Local pid:
- pubs:738331
- Copyright holder:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Nature Publishing Group at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3958
Journal article
On gene editing and its uses: the views of the public
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record