Journal article
Christianity and the invention of the sexual revolution in Britain, 1963–1967
- Abstract:
- This article argues that the myth of ‘the sexual revolution’, increasingly accepted in Britain's national media between 1963 and 1967, played a central role in causing the real transformation of British sexual culture that occurred from the late 1960s. It also argues that Christian agency played an important role in the framing and the legitimation of this myth. Until 1963, British debates about sexual morality had been dominated by Christian arguments. In 1963 and 1964, the existence of a rapid, widespread, inexorable, secular, and antinomian transformation of sexual mores was prominently proclaimed by Christian commentators, who thought it an inevitable consequence of ‘secularization’, whereas secular commentators usually objected that this narrative was insufficiently evidenced. After its initial discussion in the mainstream media in 1965, the ‘sexual revolution’ narrative was increasingly articulated without explicit reference to Christianity, but it usually retained theologically inspired structural features inherited from earlier religious discussions. In the late 1960s, elite perceptions of inexorable sexual liberalization decisively legitimated rapid decensorship, wider access to the pill, and the reimagination of ‘normal’ sexual behaviour, thereby importantly shaping real popular change. In this way, Christian clergymen made a significant, early, unwitting, and hitherto unacknowledged contribution to Britain's sexual revolution.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 220.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0018246X1600011X
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Historical Journal More from this journal
- Volume:
- 60
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 519-546
- Publication date:
- 2016-06-03
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-5103
- ISSN:
-
0018-246X
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:629776
- UUID:
-
uuid:102147d1-0caa-40f4-b835-ef038904a4a2
- Local pid:
-
pubs:629776
- Source identifiers:
-
629776
- Deposit date:
-
2016-07-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X1600011X
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record