Journal article icon

Journal article

Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic models including patient-reported health outcomes in oncology (EPIPHANY): a systematic review protocol

Abstract:
Introduction While there is mounting evidence of the independent prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer, it is known that the conduct of these studies may hold a number of methodological challenges. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of published studies in this research area, in order to identify methodological and statistical issues deserving special attention and to also possibly prov... Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Publisher's Version

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025054

Authors


Cottone, F More by this author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Subgroup:
Botnar Research Centre
ORCID:
0000-0002-2772-2316
Efficace, F More by this author
Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group Publisher's website
Journal:
BMJ Open Journal website
Volume:
8
Issue:
10
Pages:
Article: e025054
Publication date:
2018-10-24
Acceptance date:
2018-09-20
DOI:
EISSN:
2044-6055
Pubs id:
pubs:935167
URN:
uri:0e1d49fd-8979-4fa9-8def-45d83f8fb0ac
UUID:
uuid:0e1d49fd-8979-4fa9-8def-45d83f8fb0ac
Local pid:
pubs:935167
Language:
English
Keywords:

Terms of use


Metrics



If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP