Journal article : Review

Jeff Jackson: Equality beyond Debate: John Dewey's Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. x, 303.)

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Bagg, S. (2019). Jeff Jackson: Equality beyond Debate: John Dewey's Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. x, 303.). Review of Politics, 82(1), 164–167.

MLA Style

Bagg, S. “Jeff Jackson: Equality beyond Debate: John Dewey's Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. x, 303.).” Review of Politics, vol. 82, no. 1, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 164–67.

Chicago Style

Bagg, S. 2019. “Jeff Jackson: Equality beyond Debate: John Dewey's Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. x, 303.).” Review of Politics 82 (1): 164–67.
Tweet
Print

Access Document

Files:: BaggetalAAM2019.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 218.0KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1017/s0034670519000640

Authors

+ Bagg, S More by this author

Institution:

University of Oxford

Division:

SSD

Sub department:

Politics & Int Relations

Oxford college:

Nuffield College

Role:

Author

ORCID:

0000-0001-6126-3232

Bibliographic Details

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press
Journal:: Review of Politics More from this journal
Volume:: 82
Issue:: 1
Pages:: 164-167
Publication date:: 2019-12-20
Acceptance date:: 2019-10-17
DOI:: 10.1017/s0034670519000640
EISSN:: 1748-6858
ISSN:: 0034-6705

Item Description

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR
Subtype:: Review
Pubs id:: 1088776
Local pid:: pubs:1088776
Deposit date:: 2021-02-24

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: University of Notre Dame
Copyright date:: 2019
Rights statement:: © University of Notre Dame 2019
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670519000640

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Metrics

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP