Journal article icon

Journal article

Regulating genome editing: for an enlightened democratic governance

Abstract:

How should we regulate genome editing in the face of persistent substantive disagreement about the moral status of this technology and its applications? In this paper, we aim to contribute to resolving this question. We first present two diametrically opposed possible approaches to the regulation of genome editing. A first approach, which we refer to as “elitist,” is inspired by Joshua Greene’s work in moral psychology. It aims to derive at an abstract theoretical level what preferences peopl...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Publisher's version

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/S0963180118000403

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Humanities Division
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Humanities Division
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Devolder, K
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Giubilini, A
Wellcome Trust More from this funder
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
Journal:
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Journal website
Volume:
28
Issue:
1
Pages:
76-88
Publication date:
2018-12-20
Acceptance date:
2018-04-23
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-2147
ISSN:
0963-1801
Pubs id:
pubs:854148
URN:
uri:08a82959-3055-4808-92eb-534866c7db31
UUID:
uuid:08a82959-3055-4808-92eb-534866c7db31
Local pid:
pubs:854148

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP