- Abstract:
-
How should we regulate genome editing in the face of persistent substantive disagreement about the moral status of this technology and its applications? In this paper, we aim to contribute to resolving this question. We first present two diametrically opposed possible approaches to the regulation of genome editing. A first approach, which we refer to as “elitist,” is inspired by Joshua Greene’s work in moral psychology. It aims to derive at an abstract theoretical level what preferences peopl...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Publisher's version
- Files:
-
-
(pdf, 508.9KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0963180118000403
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Journal website
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 76-88
- Publication date:
- 2018-12-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-04-23
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-2147
- ISSN:
-
0963-1801
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:854148
- URN:
-
uri:08a82959-3055-4808-92eb-534866c7db31
- UUID:
-
uuid:08a82959-3055-4808-92eb-534866c7db31
- Local pid:
- pubs:854148
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
-
Copyright © 2018 Cambridge University Press.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal article
Regulating genome editing: for an enlightened democratic governance
Actions
Access Document
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Funding
Wellcome Trust
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record