Journal article
A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
- Abstract:
-
Introduction: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative online tool to the usual peer reviewer process in evaluating the completeness of reporting and switched primary outcomes in completed reports.
Methods and analysis: This is a cross-section...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Version of record, pdf, 598.1KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BMJ Open Journal website
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 9
- Pages:
- 1-11
- Publication date:
- 2017-09-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-07-28
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
Item Description
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:710156
- UUID:
-
uuid:04c7b981-79fd-42ce-9c45-b6c616ff67ae
- Local pid:
- pubs:710156
- Source identifiers:
-
710156
- Deposit date:
- 2017-08-25
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © Chauvin, et al (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record