Journal article icon

Journal article

Microbiology and visual outcomes of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis in Oxford, UK

Abstract:
Purpose: To review the microbiology of culture-positive cases of bacterial endophthalmitis, and to correlate this with visual outcomes. Method: Case notes were reviewed for culture-positive cases of bacterial endophthalmitis over a period from November 1999 to June 2012. Cases were identified retrospectively using a local database. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 47 cases of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis identified, 81 % occurred postoperatively, 11 % followed intravitreal injection, 6 % had an endogenous source and 2 % followed ocular trauma. Eighty-seven percent of bacteria cultured were Gram-positive. The most commonly identified organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (47 %) and Streptococcus spp. (30 %). Patients were treated with intravitreal vancomycin and either amikacin or ceftazidime. All Gram-negative isolates were sensitive to aminoglycosides and ceftazidime, and all Gram-positive isolates were vancomycin-sensitive. Final visual acuity (VA) was 6/12 or better in 41 % of cases and counting fingers (CF) or worse in 30 %. Endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus spp. was associated with a poorer final VA (OR for CF or worse = 14.9, P < 0.01). Cases caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococci had a better visual outcome (OR for VA of 6/12 or better = 5.7, P = 0.013). Five eyes were eviscerated or enucleated. Infection with Haemophilus influenzae was strongly associated with this outcome (OR = 57, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Over the time period of this study there was no evidence of emerging resistance to empirical antibiotics which are commonly used for the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis. Infection with coagulase-negative Staphylococci was associated with a good visual outcome, whilst infection with Streptococcus spp. or Haemophilus influenzae was associated with a poor visual outcome.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1007/s00417-014-2658-7

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology More from this journal
Volume:
252
Issue:
11
Pages:
1825-1830
Publication date:
2014-11-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1435-702X
ISSN:
0721-832X


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:571370
UUID:
uuid:01202164-b026-4500-b8f7-a4579aca971b
Local pid:
pubs:571370
Source identifiers:
571370
Deposit date:
2015-10-26
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP