ORA Thesis: "Dilemmas of regional governance: sub-national territorial politics and river basin management in the USA, France, China, and India" - uuid:2515499e-bff9-4c13-93b2-8a47fbdc9f96

68 views

Thesis

Links & Downloads

Local copy not available for download in ORA



http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/ora:7567

Reference: Scott Michael Moore, (2013). Dilemmas of regional governance: sub-national territorial politics and river basin management in the USA, France, China, and India. DPhil. University of Oxford.

Citable link to this page: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2515499e-bff9-4c13-93b2-8a47fbdc9f96
 
Title: Dilemmas of regional governance: sub-national territorial politics and river basin management in the USA, France, China, and India

Abstract:

This dissertation identifies and explores the dilemma of regional governance, namely how to address political and economic challenges which occur at the meso-, as opposed to local, national, or international scale. Drawing on a large body of theoretical work on decentralization and federalism, this dissertation addresses the question, how do different institutional arrangements for political, fiscal, and administrative decentralization influence the capacity of political systems to capture regional-scale externalities? It does so by examining the responses of four different political systems, two federal and two unitary, to the problem of capturing economic externalities through River Basin Management (RBM), a quintessential regional issue. RBM outcomes are operationalized in terms of efficacy of capture of both water quality and quantity externalities which occur within inter-jurisdictional river basins.

Through close historical analysis of six paired case studies across the four country cases, the dissertation argues that the capacity of political systems to capture regional-scale externalities depends on the ability of sub-national jurisdictions to pursue localized preferences, which is in this dissertation referred to as sub-national territorial politics. These politics are most prevalent in federal systems, which typically accord sub-national territorial jurisdictions with greater political power and fiscal resources. These political systems feature fewer and weaker regional governance institutions, and generally less effective regional-scale externality capture, than their counterparts.

This dissertation contributes to a growing "sub-national turn" in comparative politics in two ways. First, it identifies the geographically-rooted interests which often shape sub-national actor preferences, particularly with respect to natural resource issues. Second, the dissertation discerns the lack of political incentives for central governments to resolve disputes between sub-national administrative jurisdictions, particularly in the federal systems in which these units are the basis for political representation at the national level.


Digital Origin:Born digital
Type of Award:DPhil
Level of Award:Doctoral
Awarding Institution: University of Oxford
Notes:This thesis is not currently available in ORA.
About The Authors
institutionUniversity of Oxford
facultySocial Sciences Division - Politics and International Relations
oxfordCollegeMerton College
fundingRhodes Trust
 
Contributors
RoleSupervisor
 
Bibliographic Details
Issue Date: 2013
Copyright Date: 2013
Identifiers
Urn: uuid:2515499e-bff9-4c13-93b2-8a47fbdc9f96
Item Description
Relationships
Member of collection : ora:thesis
Alternate metadata formats
Rights
Copyright Holder: Scott Michael Moore
Terms of Use: Click here for our Terms of Use